Chahar angosht Persian movie
"Chahar angosht" is the same discourse of oxidants in different locks with somewhat different characters that could be appealing to the audience at the time of Nowruz's appearances and at least a fun and memorable moment for them, but this entertainment has become so jagged that many in the movie theater And it is in front of the screen. Apart from all the sexual stereotypes and sexuality that Hamid Mohammadi had experienced in oxidizing and has become Shtablon Gosheh and film shop in Iran's cinema, four fingers must be considered a worrying thing for the comedy stream of Iranian cinema.
Chahar angosht is abit weak iranian comedy
This concern is not at all related to the characters of the film, because before that, a caricature, a spurious look and a rebellion of the religious group in the Iranian cinema has been presented. In this film Iranin movie, again, we face Amir Jafari's typical and repetitive character, who appeared as a middle-aged religious figure of Nawlah, Hobasz and hypocrite. While he is holding the iPhone, he slogans the death of a foreigner. He speaks in revolutionary words and acts hypocritically in practice. On the pretext of Hajj travel, he goes to Thailand to go to his fellow wife in the days leading up to his government office to relate to him on previous trips. We also have the character of Javad Ezati, who is from bread to the rate of dinner parties who, although wearing cotton coats with a sandal and waist bags, uses a 10-inch tablet instead of a mobile phone so that his nokia will come to the eye more extensively on the scene, but the same character in the mind The audience is seen as dynamic, modern, intelligent, and generally more positive than the religious one.
Of course, neither these typographical and repetitive characters have been worn in the weak story, nor has it been stereotyped stereotypes, which exacerbates worrying concerns of culture, the name of the film and the director's concern. In the film it is repeatedly stated that the distance between hell and paradise is 4 fingers, without this distance being explained.
Chahar angosht download
What is the distance between "truth" and "falsehood" and not paradise and hell (!), Which is expressed by the character of the character, without knowing in the story? This distance between the "ear" and the "eye," or the same chahar angosht, does not fit in the story unless under the pretext of cleansing and sacrificing other ideologies to humiliate the Iranian cultural and religious tradition. If the story is "Chahar angosht", the Buddhists have more honor and morals than all Muslims and compatriots in Iran. Contrary to what we "saw" in the massacre and killing of the oppressed Muslim Myanmar and the "we did not hear" the sound of the cinema and the media, the four fingers are trying to make us realize that the distance between the other religions and the coexistence of them with them is not enough to hear about them and their excommunication. ; The same determination that was made in oxidants about the coexistence of Christians and Muslims. Although Oxidan did not deny this peaceful coexistence with Christianity, it seems that Oxidant's best-selling movie has urged Mohammed to portray Thai for Buddha for his own intentions.
The "truth" is lost in the works of Hamed Mohammadi. Entertaining plans are just an attempt to attract audiences and to forget the boundaries of truth. Indeed, she is looking for an unassuming sweetheart and a romantic look at all things in the world; a look that comes to law and tries to make jokes and enjoy everything without having to make an obligation on her own. An obsessive audience, even if the pervasive sexual burden of such films is tolerated, can not be a source of indecisiveness and insult to the religion of Islam, in the same vein of peaceful coexistence with other schools.
